Neil Thackray’s Business Media Blog

Just another WordPress.com weblog

Starting a discussion about the future of B2B Media

Since as long as I can remember, the business press has been spoken of as the poor relation of the media sector. Dull, boring, worthy. For the same amount of time we have been pretending that we are on the cusp of being cool. I remember in the mid to late eighties giving an interview to Media Week , which was then very new and very interested in business media, where I argued excatly that. Business media was coming of age (I think we called it business publishing then, thinking that was more sophisticated than trade and tech!).  I can hear myself saying it behind a rather preposterous moustache.  (what was I thinking?)

I think  now that debate is moribund and perverse. Business media journalism has always been highly valued by the newspapers, largely because, for all its faults, the resource applied to a sector ensured that what the trade title wrote was pretty damn good, and proabably more knowledgable than anything the national press could write. Back in 1996 when I left Reed, Caterer and Hotelkeeper had a total edit team of about 25 people. Wow!

Today the world is rather strange. All trade mags are living on considerably smaller edit resources than was the case ten years ago. A business journalist today must not only walk his beat and write his story, but probably sub it, lay it out and before very long (if paid circ numbers on business mags are anything to go by), read it too. Newspapers are facing the same pressures.  If you haven’t  already do read Flat Earth News to understand the impact of editorial resource constraint in news.

Once upon a time the national newspapers would scour the trades for leads or stories they could repeat.  They probably still do.  The problem is the trades are scouring the nationals for their business stories too! Its a unvirtuous circle which inevitably means standards are falling both in national newspaper coverage and in business media coverage.

On top of the dangers of budget restraint, the growth of the Internet has had two pernicious effects on the future editorial viability of business magazines.  First the news, the lifeblood of a weekly mag, is available 24/7 and immediately.  I haven’t picked up a copy of Media Week or Press Gazette since we sold them four years ago.   This hasn’t been deliberate, its just that I don’t need them any longer when I can find the news on the web.  I bet your reading habits have changed.  And so have all the readers of business magazines habits changed.

The second effect has been the result of the phenomonen you are reading now.  The lone or collaborating blogger.  It is almost a cliche that now everyone is a journalist.  As journalists get laid off, there will be more and more lone writers.   They are often pretty good too.  Try this for an experiment.  Read the Press Gazette web site and then read Jon Slattery (a former PG long term staffer).  Which is better?  In addition the business world is full of what we might call “expert witnesses”, not journos but just well informed folk who for the first time have a mouthpiece they can access. Some of them are pretty good too.

This has had dramatic impact on business magazine brands.  Far from being the “bible of the industry” they are reduced to being one of many sources of information in a world where reader loyalty is as fickle as a click on a Google search result.

It has been said by many in our business (including me from time to time) that it is the business media sector that has led the way in exploiting the Internet.  The good folk at Outsell will give you numerous examples of how business media companies have built workflow and paid information solutions and so on.  Quite right too.  But what about the future of business to business journalism? How can we make money and provide a credible information service to business decsion makers that will help them make a better decision?

The horrible truth is that right now, we are long way from knowing the answer to that problem but we can begin to ask ourselves the right questions.  It is an undeniable fact that profitability of business magazines is in decline. It almost certainly true that this decline is, if not terminal, then chronically debilitating.  The migration to web based business solutions has for the most part been a shambles.  Inferior web offerings have been subsidised by weakening off line prioducts.  For those without a substantial online recruitment offering, revenues are sparse- at least when compared to the good old days of successful business magazine publishing.

With the state of the world being as it is, there is no more time in my view, to put off dealing with the issue.  In future papers I want to talk about some of the ways we can tackle the problem I have outlined in this paper.  There are many.  The topics can include pricing strategy, the role of offline magazines in an online world, building a new advertiser paradigm, how to afford editorial, where are the new online opportunities, what is stopping the business media companies from being businesses with high growth potential, what needs to be done now to survive the downturn, what skills are needed to get this done, how should we contruct our organisations to get this done, what’s wrong with b2b sales people and why it’s not their fault, what is the role of paid information, what do advertisers really want and why they won’t buy online ads from you?

If you can, join the conversation or by all means contact me privately if you prefer at neil.thackray@googlemail.com

In the meantime though let me leave you with this observation.  Where traditional media companies have done well in building on line business models it has almost always been a result of buying wisely (think of Emap and WGN), or nurturing new models away from the traditional business (think Total Jobs at Reed).  Why then have we found it so hard to face up to this in migrating our news and information model from the tree to the web?

Reblog this post [with Zemanta]
Advertisements

January 29, 2009 - Posted by | Uncategorized | , , ,

6 Comments »

  1. Hi Neil –

    The fact we get 120,000 unique vistors a month to http://www.pressgazette.co.uk would suggest we do something useful.
    How many readers does this blog have? How does this compare to websites your company runs?
    I too am a fan of Jon Slattery’s blog – but I would suggest there is still an important role for sites like us which break the stories for the bloggers to blog about.
    We also do a lot of blogging ourselves at blogs.pressgazette.co.uk.
    BTW if you haven’t picked up a copy of Media Week or Press Gazette for four years – how do you know what you are missing?
    Send me your address and I will stick a copy in the post (with a subscription form!).

    Comment by Dominic Ponsford | January 30, 2009

  2. Dear Neil,
    Speaking as a blogger and an ex-staffer on Press Gazette, I think B2B titles could have a great future on the web as long as they are well resourced and produce high quality editorial.

    It just needs the brains on the management side of the business to come up with the ideas (admitedly not easy) to generate revenues to sustain a decent editorial product.

    B2B managements, unlike in newspapers, have in the past been good at raising cash through revenue streams other than cover prices, like awards, exhibitions and conferences.

    To stand out in the “everything for free” world of the internet you must have high quality, unique editorial.

    Bloggers are never going to replace a well run team of B2B journalists who know their sector, get out and about meeting and interviewing people and can produce news and features that cannot be found elsewhere.

    Comment by Jon Slattery | January 30, 2009

  3. […] Starting a discussion about the future of B2B media […]

    Pingback by Comms Links 30/01/09 | January 30, 2009

  4. Dominic,
    I love your passion for PG and I agree 120k a month is pretty good for a b2b site. There is certainly a role for PG and no one was more pleased than me that you got a lifeline from Wilmington. My point though was that the impact of all that has happened is that you are trying to do now what you did before but with less people. You are also competing for eyeballs with lots of other writers – including Jon. The impact of your own success in geting traffic and others who compete with you for traffic has been a cut in hard copy frequency and a cut in resources. You also still hold back content for the mag, which is the opposite of what a pure play online comeptitor would do. All this doesn’t make PG irrelevant but it does raise the bar in terms of the level of challenge.

    At Nexus, our most succesful website gets around 1.5m uniques (but to be fair its b2c!) This blog only started yesterday so who knows!

    Also I think you are on to something with your collection of blogs. The role of the “expert witness” is vital as it spawns the community element that is the protein of healthy web destinations.

    Finally I was careful not to opine on whether Jon was better or worse than the PG website. To a large degree it is comparing apples with pears.. The point though, is that for business mag publishers, the competitive set is wider and nimbler than ever. And its probably a very long time since Jon was called nimble. 😉

    For the record I think being editor of PG is one fo the toughest jobs in b2b media. PG is lucky to have you.

    N

    Comment by neilthackray | January 30, 2009

  5. Hold on a minute Neil, what do you mean? …”And its probably a very long time since Jon was called nimble.”

    I am a couple of stone lighter than Dominic and still nimble enough to notice there should be an
    apostrophe in ‘its’.

    Regards,

    Jon S.

    Comment by Jon Slattery | January 30, 2009

  6. […] was struck by his posting in January, 2009 in which he said: I haven’t picked up a copy of Media Week or Press Gazette […]

    Pingback by Why B2B media is changing for the better in a digital world « MediaBriefing Expert's Blog | September 27, 2010


Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s

%d bloggers like this: