The Future for B2B May Not Be In Content
A study by Outsell (only available to subscribers) surfaces one of the underlying systemic issues affecting business media companies. They asked business to business marketeers in the USA what they were doing with the money they were no longer spending on trade press advertising. In summary the money went;
- 29% will be spent on the company’s own web site
- 21% will be spent on paid search and search engine advertising
- 17% will be spent on events
- 15% will be spent on other online community or special interest sites
Back in the days of Web 1.0 we used to talk a lot about the opportunities that arose from disintermediation. Now it appears that it is the business media companies themselves that are being disintermediated by their own customers.
One of the biggest costs of trading as a magazine publisher is distribution. Building a circualtion and then providing access to it for advertisers was the essence of the profit model. In the digital world, distribution is pretty cheap and marketeers are discovering that they can build traffic on their sites directly without relying on business media publishers.
The implications of this are clear. If we take the Outsell numbers at face value, even if we succeed with our online content models we might only expect to win back 15% of the money we are losing from print. That won’t support the costs of a comprehensive content model. If we are to win our full share of the digital cake we are going to have to think differently about the business we are in.
Last week I spoke on a panel at the E Publishing Innovation Conference and I reminded the delegates of Michael Wolffs book from the early days of the Internet, Burn Rate. In this highly entertaining book Wolff describes his adventures in raising money for start up companie in the febrile world of Silicon Valley. At the end of the book, he declares a worry. What, he postulates, if it turns out that the Internet revolution is not about media at all?
It turns out that he may have been right. Although content and media may be part of the solution for business media companies it should not be at the centre of strategy development. What we need to do is examine closely what our customers (the companies we used to call advertisers) are doing with their spend and help them to do it better. As I have argued before, nobody wants to buy advertising next to content, what marketeers really want is tools that help them sell more stuff. That certainly means we are in the lead generation business. We might also need to be in the business of providing widgets and applications and marketing services that improve the effciency of marketeers own websites. Of course content is part of what we do, but if we think it is the purpose of what we do, our revenues from “advertisers” are going to be modest.
Related articles by Zemanta
- No Website: No Business (startupprofessionals.com)
- 5 Keys to Planning Your 2008 Internet Marketing Strategy (smtusa.com)
1 Comment »
Leave a comment
-
Archives
- October 2009 (4)
- September 2009 (2)
- July 2009 (4)
- June 2009 (1)
- May 2009 (6)
- April 2009 (5)
- March 2009 (5)
- February 2009 (10)
- January 2009 (3)
-
Categories
-
RSS
Entries RSS
Comments RSS
![Reblog this post [with Zemanta]](http://img.zemanta.com/reblog_e.png?x-id=970e93ad-ce83-4669-abc5-d10d3b734d8d)

Very interesting statistics.
I think a huge benefit to a client would be to first help them identify where their potential buyers are going on the internet, then develop creative ways to engage those buyers once you’ve found them.
Traditionally, media companies have been doing a great job of developing exciting creative, but following the moving target that is your audience is the challenge. Good ads with no eyeballs on them don’t help much.
Thanks.